Radius falters after a PhIII osteoporosis fail and a breast cancer disappointment, sending shares plummeting

Ra­dius Health saw shares tank on Wednes­day af­ter re­port­ing two Phase III study re­sults, one for an os­teo­poro­sis patch treat­ment that failed and one for a breast can­cer ther­a­py show­ing low­er ef­fi­ca­cy re­sults than ex­pect­ed.

The biotech is look­ing to de­vel­op a patch ver­sion of its in­jectable Tym­los drug for os­teo­poro­sis in post­menopausal women, but the treat­ment missed its pri­ma­ry end­point and did not show non-in­fe­ri­or­i­ty rel­a­tive to the ap­proved in­jec­tion. Ra­dius is still an­gling to de­vel­op the treat­ment, but ex­ecs said in an in­vestor call it would cause at least a two-year de­lay.

Mean­while, Ra­dius boast­ed of ex­cel­lent Phase III re­sults for the breast can­cer ther­a­py in Oc­to­ber, but fuller re­sults Wednes­day showed the biotech un­der­de­liv­ered in in­vestors’ eyes. While the treat­ment did reach sta­tis­ti­cal sig­nif­i­cance in the pri­ma­ry, re­duc­ing the risk of pro­gres­sion or death com­pared to stan­dard of care by 30%, most of the ben­e­fit ap­peared to come from a spe­cif­ic mu­ta­tion sub­group.

As a re­sult, Ra­dius shares $RDUS slid 44% in Wednes­day’s trad­ing ses­sion, wip­ing out near­ly all the val­ue gained off Oc­to­ber’s breast can­cer news.

Top biotech an­a­lyst Ge­of­frey Porges was all over the news, tak­ing a slight­ly less fa­tal­is­tic view than most in de­scrib­ing the da­ta as ‘not such a ship­wreck.’ Where­as the os­teo­poro­sis patch was pre­vi­ous­ly like­ly to roll out in 2023, Porges now ex­pects a 2025 de­but at the ear­li­est, mak­ing the treat­ment ‘sal­vage­able.’

Porges placed an as­ter­isk on the launch, how­ev­er, as he al­so not­ed that in or­der to con­tin­ue con­duct­ing clin­i­cal stud­ies, Ra­dius said it needs to en­list ‘non-tra­di­tion­al fi­nanc­ing … with­out lean­ing on their bal­ance sheet or is­su­ing more eq­ui­ty.’ It will prob­a­bly take un­til the mid­dle of next year be­fore Ra­dius ce­ments its path for­ward here, he added.

For the breast can­cer drug, known as elaces­trant, Jef­feries an­a­lyst Eun Yang de­scribed the fuller dataset as ‘sur­pris­ing­ly mod­est’ and high­light­ed a much high­er ef­fi­ca­cy for pa­tients with ESR1-mu­ta­tions, ac­count­ing for 47% of the pop­u­la­tion. Though the can­di­date hit the pri­ma­ry end­point, Yang es­ti­mat­ed a me­di­an PFS of on­ly 1.9 months in non-mu­tant pa­tients, which is sim­i­lar to stan­dard of care.

That could lim­it the ap­proval to on­ly the rel­e­vant sub­group, Yang wrote to in­vestors, se­vere­ly damp­en­ing the drug’s po­ten­tial sales.

The full da­ta were as fol­lows: the os­teo­poro­sis patch demon­strat­ed a 7.1% in­crease com­pared to base­line in lum­bar spine bone min­er­al den­si­ty af­ter a year, com­pared to 10.8% in the vol­un­teers who re­ceived the in­jectable form of Tym­los. The patch al­so missed non-in­fe­ri­or­i­ty on sec­ondary end­points look­ing at head and femoral neck bone den­si­ty, hit­ting 2.0% and 1.9% in­creas­es com­pared to 3.7% and 3.4%, re­spec­tive­ly.

In the elaces­trant tri­al, the drug re­duced risk of pro­gres­sion or death by 30% com­pared to SoC in the over­all pop­u­la­tion and by 45% in the ESR1-mu­tat­ed sub­group. The p-val­ues came in at p=0.0018 and p=0.0005 for each. Ra­dius said the me­di­an PFS was ex­tend­ed by 2.79 months in the whole study, com­pared to 1.91 months for stan­dard of care. .

Tym­los was Ra­dius’ first-ever drug ap­proval, get­ting an FDA nod back in 2017 and go­ing up against heavy­weights in J&J and Am­gen. Elaces­trant’s glob­al com­mer­cial rights were ac­quired by the Menar­i­ni Group in 2020 for $30 mil­lion, and Menar­i­ni is on the hook for $320 mil­lion in mile­stones and roy­al­ties in the low to mid-teens.
https://endpts.com/radius-falters-after-a-phiii-osteoporosis-fail-and-another-breast-cancer-disappointment-sending-shares-plummeting/