Pfizer plans to study a third shot for its Covid-19 vaccine in the youngest kids, pushing back its timeline farther

Amer­i­can chil­dren un­der the age of five may not be vac­ci­nat­ed un­til mid-2022, as Pfiz­er said Fri­day that it’s go­ing to now test a third dose of its Covid-19 vac­cine in the tri­al.

The de­ci­sion comes as Pfiz­er an­nounced non-in­fe­ri­or­i­ty was not met for chil­dren be­tween the ages of two and five when com­pared to old­er teenagers in the cur­rent tri­al.

Pfiz­er pre­vi­ous­ly said it might ap­ply for an EUA in this youngest pop­u­la­tion by the end of De­cem­ber or ear­ly next year, but now says that if the three-dose study proves suc­cess­ful, Pfiz­er and BioN­Tech ex­pect to sub­mit da­ta to reg­u­la­tors to sup­port an EUA ‘in the first half of 2022.’

The shift to three dos­es was made af­ter a rou­tine re­view by the ex­ter­nal in­de­pen­dent Da­ta Mon­i­tor­ing Com­mit­tee, and the tri­al will now eval­u­ate a third dose of 3 µg at least two months af­ter the sec­ond dose in this young age group. Here’s how Pfiz­er ex­plained the non-in­fe­ri­or­i­ty is­sue with the 2- to 5-year-old group in the tri­al:

While the study is on­go­ing and re­mains blind­ed, a pre-spec­i­fied im­muno­genic­i­ty analy­sis was con­duct­ed on a sub­set of the study pop­u­la­tion one month fol­low­ing the sec­ond dose. Com­pared to the 16- to 25-year-old pop­u­la­tion in which high ef­fi­ca­cy was demon­strat­ed, non-in­fe­ri­or­i­ty was met for the 6- to 24-month-old pop­u­la­tion but not for the 2- to un­der 5-year-old pop­u­la­tion in this analy­sis. No safe­ty con­cerns were iden­ti­fied and the 3 µg dose demon­strat­ed a fa­vor­able safe­ty pro­file in chil­dren 6 months to un­der 5 years of age.

Pfiz­er and BioN­Tech are al­so shift­ing to a three-dose reg­i­men for all ages, as the com­pa­nies plan to eval­u­ate a third dose of the 10 µg for­mu­la­tion in chil­dren five to un­der 12 years of age. Ad­di­tion­al­ly, the com­pa­nies have ini­ti­at­ed a low dose sub-study of a third dose of 10 µg or 30 µg in ap­prox­i­mate­ly 600 ado­les­cents aged 12- to 17 to as­sess safe­ty and im­muno­genic­i­ty.

Ini­tial­ly, the Phase I/II/III tri­al, which en­rolled about 4,500 chil­dren aged six months to un­der 12 years in the US, Fin­land, Poland and Spain, was de­signed to eval­u­ate the safe­ty, tol­er­a­bil­i­ty and im­muno­genic­i­ty of the Pfiz­er-BioN­Tech vac­cine on a two-dose sched­ule (ap­prox­i­mate­ly 21 days apart) in three age groups: ages five to un­der 12 years; ages two to un­der five years; and ages six months to un­der two years.

In ad­di­tion to Pfiz­er, Mod­er­na is work­ing on its own Covid-19 vac­cine tri­al for those be­tween the ages of six months and 12.

Stephen Hoge, pres­i­dent of Mod­er­na, said in the com­pa­ny’s Q3 earn­ings call that the com­pa­ny sub­mit­ted da­ta from its Kid­Cove study to the FDA as well as to oth­er coun­tries.

But Hoge not­ed that the com­pa­ny was re­cent­ly no­ti­fied by the FDA that the agency ‘will re­quire ad­di­tion­al time to eval­u­ate our pro­posed amend­ment due to re­cent analy­sis of the risk of my­ocardi­tis af­ter vac­ci­na­tion in some pop­u­la­tions. The agency ex­pects this eval­u­a­tion may ex­tend un­til Jan­u­ary 2022.’

Sensor-based technology for clinical trial data collection represents the latest medical paradigm shift. There are more than 700 clinical studies involving wearable devices currently underway in the United States. A study from Intel IT projects their inclusion in clinical trials will surge to 70% by 2025.

Apps, biosensors and patient-centered technologies increase visibility of comprehensive patient data. Pharma leaders anticipate the benefits of wearables to include better data (58%), faster results (33%) and lower trial costs (10%).

Richard Pazdur (via AACR)

There’s no denying that Merck’s Keytruda set a high bar for checkpoint inhibitors in development everywhere. But when it comes to the often redundant development of PD(L)-1 antibodies worldwide, FDA’s top cancer doctors Rick Pazdur and Julia Beaver are calling for more industry coordination.

‘Efforts to corral this enthusiasm should focus on increased international partnerships between sponsors of approved checkpoint inhibitors and those developing novel agents to be used with anti–PD-1 and anti–PD-L1 antibodies rather than developing ‘me too’ drugs,’ Beaver and Pazdur wrote Wednesday in the New England Journal of Medicine.

Unlock this story instantly and join 125,900+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it’s free.

Remember the sandwich generation? That’s the group of middle-aged people who are caring for both children and aging parents.

It’s a group that pharma companies often market to directly as parents who are making decisions about vaccinations, routine visits or rare conditions, but less often in their roles as caregivers who are making healthcare decisions for older family members.

But maybe they should.

Unlock this story instantly and join 125,900+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it’s free.

A Chrysalis Initiative and Intouch Solutions campaign features art depictions of Black women with a white not-equal sign drawn over to point out disparity in breast cancer care.

Jamil Rivers went from metastatic breast cancer patient to advocate to non-profit founder – all in her pursuit of breast cancer healthcare equity for Black women. Her mission began a few years ago when at age 39, she was diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer. As she navigated her care and the health system, she was shocked to find out that Black women die from breast cancer at a 40% higher rate than white women.

Unlock this story instantly and join 125,900+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it’s free.

The FDA on Wednesday not only approved the first generic versions of the decades-old diabetes insipidus treatment vasopressin, but also simultaneously offered a particularly damning rebuke of a citizen petition attempting to block the generic, while promising to pass along the matter to the Federal Trade Commission.

The response could prove troublesome for the sponsor of the brand name version of the drug, Endo’s Par Sterile Products, which brought in more than $780 million in 2020 for its brand name version of the drug Vasostrict.

A nurse administers a COVID-19 booster shot to Joe Rigdon at a vaccination site in Eastmonte Park, Altamonte Springs. (Photo by Paul Hennessy/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images)

When Laura Burns went to get her first Covid-19 shot last January, no one had warned her that the vaccines might not work for her.

Burns, the recipient of a double-lung transplant in 2016, knew to be careful about the medicines she took. She consulted with her transplant team when the Pfizer and Moderna shots were authorized and only signed up after being told the vaccines would likely be safe for her, which they were.

Unlock this story instantly and join 125,900+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it’s free.

Well, Purdue Pharma’s multi-billion dollar opioid settlement is now in jeopardy — a federal judge just said no.

Colleen McMahon, a judge on the US District Court for the Southern District of New York, said that the settlement, which would dissolve Purdue Pharma and was approved in September by a bankruptcy judge, should not go forward because it releases the company’s owners, members of the billionaire Sackler family, from liability in civil opioid-related cases.

Usama Malik, ex-Immunomedics CFO

A couple weeks after facing insider trading allegations, former Immunomedics CFO Usama Malik responded to the charges in a vaguely worded LinkedIn post reflecting on the moment when his ‘world was upended.’

Malik was charged on Dec. 2 over allegations that he tipped off his then-girlfriend and four others that a Phase III study for Immunomedics’ breast cancer drug Trodelvy would be stopped early, the Department of Justice said in a complaint. Those individuals went on to purchase more than 9,000 Immunomedics shares, with one of them selling those shares right after the news broke and the biotech’s stock price doubled.

Unlock this story instantly and join 125,900+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it’s free.

The European Medicines Agency announced Friday it recommended the European Commission reject Aduhelm, dealing a new — albeit expected — blow to Biogen’s hopes of finding a widespread market for its struggling Alzheimer’s drug.

The EMA recommendation had been expected for a month, since the EMA’s human medicines committee gave Biogen ‘a negative trend vote’ after an oral presentation from the company. As such Biogen’s stock, which has lost all the stratospheric value it gained after Aduhelm’s approval in June, only ticked down 3% pre-market Friday, from $235.52 to $235.

Unlock this story instantly and join 125,900+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it’s free.
https://endpts.com/pfizer-plans-to-trial-a-third-shot-for-its-covid-19-vaccine-in-the-youngest-kids-pushing-back-its-timeline-farther/