Multiple blockbusters from Gilead, Pfizer, Vertex see (list) price hikes to start 2022

Kick­ing off 2022, hun­dreds of phar­ma­ceu­ti­cals, in­clud­ing some block­busters, saw their list prices rise by about 5% on av­er­age. But over­all, net drug prices (cost af­ter re­bates) de­clined for the fourth year in a row, po­ten­tial­ly com­pli­cat­ing al­ready stalled drug price re­form ef­forts.

Among the drugs see­ing new in­creas­es as of Jan. 1 are Gilead’s bevy of block­buster HIV drugs.

Bik­tarvy, which pulled in more than $7 bil­lion in world­wide sales in 2020, saw a 4.8% price in­crease in 2021, and now, an­oth­er 5.6% in­crease in 2022, ac­cord­ing to a new re­port from the non­prof­it 46brook­lyn Re­search.

Gilead of­fered the same 5.6% price hikes for its oth­er HIV drugs: De­scovy, which saw sales of more than $1.8 bil­lion in 2020; Gen­voya, which brought in more than $3 bil­lion in 2020; and Odef­sey, which had $1.7 bil­lion in 2020 sales.

Pfiz­er, which is set to reap tens of bil­lions, pos­si­bly even hun­dreds of bil­lions, from its Covid-19 vac­cine and pill this year and next year, al­so hiked the price of its block­buster can­cer drug Ibrance by 6.9% to start this year. Oth­er Pfiz­er med­i­cines, in­clud­ing sev­er­al an­tibi­otics and a form of chemo, saw their prices in­crease by 10% to start the year, ac­cord­ing to GoodRx.

Mean­while, Ver­tex in­creased the price of its block­buster CF drug Trikaf­ta by 4.9% in 2022. That might not seem like a big spike in the grand scheme of things, but the drug’s list price is cur­rent­ly set at $311,000 per year, so that’s a more than $15,000 per pa­tient, per year in­crease.

ICER pre­vi­ous­ly es­ti­mat­ed that Ver­tex would need to low­er the list price of Trikaf­ta to be­tween $67,900 and $85,500 per year in or­der to bring the cost in line with its ben­e­fits. Analy­ses of the hun­dreds of price in­creas­es across the spec­trum have to be tak­en in­to con­text, and 46brook­lyn says that at first look, the de­gree of price in­creas­es in 2022 ap­pears to be ‘rel­a­tive­ly greater than the 2021 be­hav­ior.’

And ever since the in­for­mal 9.9% price hike ceil­ing was en­act­ed across phar­ma and biotech com­pa­nies, change in net prices over­all con­tin­ues to de­cline in 2022, af­ter three straight years of net price de­clines, ac­cord­ing to Adam Fein, CEO of the Drug Chan­nels In­sti­tute.

‘Ob­vi­ous­ly the dev­il’s in the de­tails,’ An­to­nio Ciac­cia of 46brook­lyn told End­points News.

Some brand drugs that have lost ex­clu­siv­i­ty have much high­er re­bates than true brand drugs. Ad­di­tion­al­ly, with launch prices be­ing a greater em­pha­sis point, it dis­torts the con­ver­sa­tion around re­bate vs list growth over time. And last­ly, since PBMs, in­sur­ers, and these new­er re­bate GPOs aren’t ob­lig­at­ed to pass through all those drug­mak­er con­ces­sions, even if net prices are go­ing down, that would be pure­ly from the view of the drug­mak­er, and the ac­tu­al pay­er may be hear­ing that net prices are go­ing down and won­der­ing, ‘huh?’

The news of the price in­creas­es comes as Con­gress is still try­ing to forge a deal around a rec­on­cil­i­a­tion bill that might in­clude drug pric­ing pro­vi­sions. Just be­fore the hol­i­day break, Sen. Joe Manchin (D-WV) halt­ed progress on a deal that would’ve al­lowed Medicare to ne­go­ti­ate on drug prices. among oth­er pro­vi­sions.

Their Staying Power Lies in their Patient-Centricity

Decentralized clinical trials (DCTs) were traditionally utilized in an isolated fashion prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. To continue their research within the constraints of the pandemic, sponsors and clinical investigators pivoted to a decentralized model out of necessity. At the onset, regulatory agencies offered some guidance on the digital approaches that are acceptable to ensure DCT approaches are applied in a way that maintains patient safety, as well as data quality and integrity.

For anyone who’s been following how the US government has been allocating and shipping supplies of its Covid-19 treatments over the past year, the news has shifted so many times that it can be difficult to keep track of what’s still being shipped and where.

More change is coming this week too, as HHS has now decided to re-start shipments of both Eli Lilly (bamlanivimab plus etesevimab) and Regeneron (casirivimab plus imdevimab) monoclonal antibody products after a short pause because neither product works against the new variant Omicron. Lilly’s combo also was halted last June due to the presence of other variants.

All the big R&D trends are on display in this new, record-topping list of drug approvals for 2021. Plus one.

Add up everything OK’d from CDER and CBER, and you have 61 new drug approvals for last year, topping the 59 OKs that had tied a record in 2020. The dark days of the early 2000s are a distant memory now, with a host of hungry upstarts promising to make their own entries one day as Big Pharmas double down on innovation.

Unlock this article along with other benefits by subscribing to one of our paid plans.

Piramal CEO Peter DeYoung (Credit: Piramal Pharma Solutions via Youtube)

During a typically quiet holiday break in biotech, Piramal Pharma made some noise, and it’s starting off 2022 with yet another big announcement.

The CDMO will invest millions into creating a high-throughput screening facility that will enhance the already existing in vitro biology capabilities at its Ahmedabad, India drug discovery site. The new expansion is scheduled to go live in Q3 of this year, and couple its biology services with chemistry capabilities already in operation.

When the FDA lifted a clinical hold on Applied Therapeutics’ lead program in galactosemia last February, the New York biotech signaled that they were then on a smooth road toward an accelerated approval, with plans to file an NDA in the third quarter of 2021.

Regulators, though, apparently changed their mind.

Applied has decided to hold on submitting an NDA for AT-007 as a treatment for galactosemia, the company disclosed, following discussions with the FDA in which the agency indicated that ‘clinical outcomes data will likely be required for approval.’

Still recovering from a setback in its lead program, Ovid Therapeutics has turned to AstraZeneca for a suite of experimental epilepsy drugs.

Ovid is paying the Big Pharma partner $5 million in cash and $7.5 million in stock to access a library of early-stage small molecules targeting the KCC2 transporter, including lead candidate OV350. AstraZeneca stands to receive milestones adding up to more than $200 million and retains an option for a strategic collaboration.

Johan Kördel, Sound Bioventures founding partner

Novo Holdings starts the new year off with a bang — right into a biotech VC’s first fund.

The firm announced its undisclosed investment — a ‘cornerstone’ investment, according to Novo — this morning into Sound Bioventures Fund I, a fund appropriately managed by Sound Bioventures. The venture capital firm aims to invest one-third of its fund in Scandinavian biotechs, another third in US and UK biotechs, and the final third in other European biotechs outside Scandinavia and the UK.

Michel Vounatsos (Credit: World Economic Forum/Ciaran McCrickard)

As Biogen stares down an impending patent cliff for its spinal muscular atrophy blockbuster Spinraza, it’s betting $60 million that a new antisense oligonucleotide from Ionis will help keep the company’s lead in that space.

Building on a yearslong relationship with Ionis, Biogen plumped down $60 million just before the new year to secure commercial and development rights to BIIB115, a preclinical SMA drug looking to one-up Spinraza, the companies announced Tuesday. The latter raked in just over $2 billion last year (a slight decrease from the year before) but faces a patent expiration as early as 2023.

Unlock this story instantly and join 126,800+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it’s free.

Elizabeth Holmes leaves federal court after the verdict in San Jose, CA, Jan. 3, 2022 (Nic Coury/AP Images)

The Theranos saga has captivated the pharma world over the last two decades, from its founding to its sharp rise and even sharper decline. And late Monday, its founder and former CEO Elizabeth Holmes was found guilty on several counts related to misleading investors, with each carrying a maximum of up to 20 years in prison.

Jurors returned the verdict Monday evening, finding Holmes guilty on one count of conspiracy to commit wire fraud and three counts of wire fraud against specific investors, with several news outlets reporting on the result. Holmes was found not guilty on four counts related to defrauding patients and jurors deadlocked on three counts of misleading individual investors.
https://endpts.com/multiple-blockbusters-from-gilead-pfizer-vertex-see-list-price-hikes-to-start-2022/