Amylyx takes its ALS program to Nasdaq, raising the stakes for the biotech’s only drug

Justin Klee (L) and Joshua Cohen (Amylyx)

The biotech that has gone all-in on ALS on its way to earn­ing one of the high­est neu­ro­science fi­nanc­ing rounds in the last five years is now ready to take the Nas­daq leap.

Amy­lyx Phar­ma­ceu­ti­cals filed its S-1 with the SEC late Thurs­day, pen­cil­ing in a $100 mil­lion raise es­ti­mate to help bring its on­ly prod­uct can­di­date to mar­ket. The move comes about five months af­ter Amy­lyx pulled in $135 mil­lion in a Se­ries C.

Found­ed by two Brown Uni­ver­si­ty room­mates with lit­tle drug de­vel­op­ment ex­pe­ri­ence, Amy­lyx has seen a sharp rise since Sep­tem­ber 2020 when a Phase II study for its ALS pro­gram AMX0035 came back pos­i­tive on func­tion, a rare feat in the dis­ease. The can­di­date beat place­bo on a func­tion­al rat­ing scale — a scale some ex­perts ar­gue has se­ri­ous is­sues — with the biotech fo­cus­ing all ef­forts on get­ting it ap­proved.

As laid out in the SEC pa­per­work, that strat­e­gy hasn’t changed. The com­pa­ny plans to fun­nel much of its IPO cash to­ward the reg­u­la­to­ry process and pre-com­mer­cial launch of AMX0035, as well as to­ward the drug’s Phase III study cur­rent­ly be­ing con­duct­ed in ALS.

And the S-1 ap­pears to fur­ther raise the stakes on just how much Amy­lyx is re­ly­ing on AMX0035 to be suc­cess­ful. The fil­ing’s ‘Risk Fac­tors’ sec­tion is lit­tered with warn­ings over the sin­gu­lar fo­cus on the ALS pro­gram, at one point not­ing ‘the de­nial of reg­u­la­to­ry ap­proval for AMX0035 in any ju­ris­dic­tion could mean that we need to de­lay or even cease op­er­a­tions.’

Since that Phase II read­out, Amy­lyx has hus­tled to en­sure that doesn’t hap­pen, as the biotech is cur­rent­ly seek­ing ap­proval in Cana­da, the US and the EU. At first, it ap­peared the FDA wasn’t re­cep­tive to that dataset, ini­tial­ly re­quest­ing Amy­lyx run an ad­di­tion­al study be­fore sub­mit­ting its ap­pli­ca­tion.

But the neu­ro land­scape changed in June af­ter the FDA con­tro­ver­sial­ly ap­proved Bio­gen’s ad­u­canum­ab for Alzheimer’s dis­ease de­spite con­cerns over its ef­fi­ca­cy and safe­ty, as well as a unan­i­mous ad­comm vote rec­om­mend­ing against ap­proval. Reg­u­la­tors re­versed course on AMX0035 in Sep­tem­ber, al­low­ing Amy­lyx to sub­mit its NDA af­ter view­ing the com­pa­ny’s Phase III pro­to­cols, co-CEO Joshua Co­hen said at the time.

Amy­lyx ul­ti­mate­ly ap­proached the agency last month with its ap­pli­ca­tion. The Phase III study al­so launched this quar­ter, with Amy­lyx plan­ning to en­roll 600 pa­tients — more than four times its Phase II tri­al pop­u­la­tion. Though the biotech says these da­ta won’t be re­quired for an FDA ap­proval, it notes in the S-1 the FDA can al­ways change its mind.

That re­ver­sal comes as ALS drug de­vel­op­ment al­so re­mains top of mind on Cap­i­tal Hill. About a week af­ter the House passed a bill to pump $500 mil­lion in­to ALS drug re­search, the Sen­ate vot­ed to pass it late Thurs­day evening, and Pres­i­dent Biden is ex­pect­ed to sign it in­to law.

The S-1 al­so gave a peek be­hind the cur­tain at some of Amy­lyx’s share­hold­ers. Both Co­hen and his co-CEO, Justin Klee, each own a 6.1% stake in their biotech. Morn­ing­side Ven­tures would be the biggest win­ner here with about 22%, while ALS In­vest gets 12.8% and Viking Glob­al owns 10.5%.

Some IPO mon­ey will al­so be set aside for pur­su­ing oth­er in­di­ca­tions, such as Alzheimer’s and Wol­fram syn­drome. When Amy­lyx be­gins trad­ing, it will do so un­der the tick­er $AM­LX.

Biotech IPOs have sub­stan­tial­ly slowed down since the pan­dem­ic boom of 2020 and ear­ly 2021, with an­a­lysts not­ing in­vestors have shift­ed to­ward ear­ly-stage pri­vate fi­nanc­ings as their pre­ferred choice. Though the in­dus­try has raised more than $31 bil­lion over the last two years, it ap­pears in­creas­ing­ly like­ly 2022 won’t keep up that pace.

Sensor-based technology for clinical trial data collection represents the latest medical paradigm shift. There are more than 700 clinical studies involving wearable devices currently underway in the United States. A study from Intel IT projects their inclusion in clinical trials will surge to 70% by 2025.

Apps, biosensors and patient-centered technologies increase visibility of comprehensive patient data. Pharma leaders anticipate the benefits of wearables to include better data (58%), faster results (33%) and lower trial costs (10%).

Richard Pazdur (via AACR)

There’s no denying that Merck’s Keytruda set a high bar for checkpoint inhibitors in development everywhere. But when it comes to the often redundant development of PD(L)-1 antibodies worldwide, FDA’s top cancer doctors Rick Pazdur and Julia Beaver are calling for more industry coordination.

‘Efforts to corral this enthusiasm should focus on increased international partnerships between sponsors of approved checkpoint inhibitors and those developing novel agents to be used with anti–PD-1 and anti–PD-L1 antibodies rather than developing ‘me too’ drugs,’ Beaver and Pazdur wrote Wednesday in the New England Journal of Medicine.

Unlock this story instantly and join 125,900+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it’s free.

Otello Stampacchia, Omega

Amid a very difficult back half of the year for biotech investing, some bullish investors are making the case for a major rally in the coming year as pharma looks to utilize its growing mountain of cash. Now, biotech blue-chipper Omega Funds is getting itself set at the starting line.

Omega has closed a $650 million investment fund it’s calling Omega Fund VII, the VC firm’s latest and largest round in its 17 years in existence, it said Friday.

The European Medicines Agency announced Friday it recommended the European Commission reject Aduhelm, dealing a new — albeit expected — blow to Biogen’s hopes of finding a widespread market for its struggling Alzheimer’s drug.

The EMA recommendation had been expected for a month, since the EMA’s human medicines committee gave Biogen ‘a negative trend vote’ after an oral presentation from the company. As such Biogen’s stock, which has lost all the stratospheric value it gained after Aduhelm’s approval in June, only ticked down 3% pre-market Friday, from $235.52 to $235.

Unlock this story instantly and join 125,900+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it’s free.

Janet Woodcock, acting FDA commissioner (Al Drago/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

Since the pandemic began, the FDA has allowed women to access the abortion drug mifepristone via the mail, making it easier for them and ensuring that they don’t have to go to a clinic to receive the pills.

The FDA’s temporary change became permanent on Thursday afternoon, with the FDA announcing that the REMS on mifepristone (brand name Mifeprex) and its generic versions must be modified by removing this in-person dispensing requirement.

Pascal Prigent, Genfit CEO

Somebody believes in elafibranor after all.

The drug, which had been considered a bright prospect in the failure-prone but highly lucrative race to treat non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, imploded after it failed a closely watched trial, forcing its developer, Genfit, to throw in the towel. But after a lonely year steering past the wreckage — chopping nearly half of its workforce in a painful restructuring — Genfit has found a trusting partner in fellow French drugmaker Ipsen.

Unlock this story instantly and join 125,900+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it’s free.

The FDA on Wednesday not only approved the first generic versions of the decades-old diabetes insipidus treatment vasopressin, but also simultaneously offered a particularly damning rebuke of a citizen petition attempting to block the generic, while promising to pass along the matter to the Federal Trade Commission.

The response could prove troublesome for the sponsor of the brand name version of the drug, Endo’s Par Sterile Products, which brought in more than $780 million in 2020 for its brand name version of the drug Vasostrict.

Robert Califf (Graeme Sloan/Sipa via AP Images)

As Rob Califf likely makes his return as FDA commissioner next month, his confirmation hearing yesterday offered a peek into some of the larger obstacles he’s going to face in the coming months and years.

The pandemic isn’t going away anytime soon with Omicron, and some vaccines and therapeutics may need to be tweaked or pulled from the market entirely as they prove to be ineffective against the new variant. The FDA, meanwhile, needs to get back on even footing with some longer-term direction.

Unlock this story instantly and join 125,900+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it’s free.

Crowd gathering at the Westin St. Francis for JPM in 2019 (Endpoints News)

Well, see you in January 2023.

In a surprise about-face, #JPM22 will now be fully virtual after organizers of the popular biotech conference decided to pull the plug on a live event in San Francisco given fears over the Omicron variant and a growing chorus of drugmakers opting out.

The move is no big surprise after reports swirled about some of the industry’s biggest players nixing plans to attend live and pressuring the bank to reconsider the annual meet at the Westin St. Francis. STAT reported Tuesday that Moderna and Amgen, among other large drugmakers, had already pulled out.
https://endpts.com/amylyx-takes-its-als-program-to-nasdaq-raising-the-stakes-for-the-biotechs-only-drug/