Oversight Committee unleashes scathing drug pricing report as Senate preps to vote on allowing Medicare negotiations

Back in Jan­u­ary 2019, the late House Over­sight Com­mit­tee chair Eli­jah Cum­mings kicked off a near­ly 3-year-long drug pric­ing in­ves­ti­ga­tion that cul­mi­nat­ed to­day in a ma­jor new re­port de­tail­ing how prices for vi­tal drugs have risen sub­stan­tial­ly since their launch, while call­ing on the Sen­ate to pass a bill that will al­low Medicare to ne­go­ti­ate some prices.

The com­mit­tee’s in­ves­ti­ga­tion fo­cused on 12 of the most ex­pen­sive drugs for Medicare, show­ing mas­sive price spikes that have ac­cu­mu­lat­ed over the years and made some drugs, like in­sulin, en­tire­ly un­af­ford­able for some, to the point where some di­a­bet­ics have had to ra­tion their life-sav­ing in­sulin, and some have died.

Doc­u­ments ob­tained by the com­mit­tee show that sev­er­al of the com­pa­nies tar­get­ed Medicare specif­i­cal­ly to boost rev­enues.

An in­ter­nal No­vo Nordisk slide deck from Oc­to­ber 2013 em­pha­sized, ‘Part D is the most prof­itable mar­ket for the No­vo Nordisk in­sulin port­fo­lio,’ and not­ed that in­sulin vol­ume for the Part D mar­ket was grow­ing three times faster than the com­mer­cial mar­ket. A 2016 pre­sen­ta­tion pre­pared for No­var­tis by an out­side con­sul­tant em­pha­sized, ‘Medicare is crit­i­cal to brand suc­cess, CMS spent ~$1 bil­lion on Gleevec in 2014.’

Build­ing off the work of three hear­ings with phar­ma­ceu­ti­cal ex­ec­u­tives from sev­en com­pa­nies, as well as oth­er pre­vi­ous re­ports, this fi­nal re­port in­cludes new find­ings from an in­ves­ti­ga­tion in­to Pfiz­er’s mar­ket­ing of its block­buster pain drug Lyri­ca, and a deep­er dive in­to the in­sulin prod­ucts from Eli Lil­ly, No­vo Nordisk, and Sanofi, which col­lec­tive­ly con­trol about 90% of the glob­al in­sulin mar­ket.

‘Over the past 20 years, they have re­peat­ed­ly and dra­mat­i­cal­ly raised the list prices of their rapid-act­ing and long-act­ing in­sulins and reaped bil­lions of dol­lars in rev­enues,’ the re­port notes, adding that Medicare lost out on more than $16 bil­lion in sav­ings be­cause of those in­creas­es.

In a press con­fer­ence on Fri­day, Mindy Salan­go, a West Vir­ginia res­i­dent who suf­fers from type 1 di­a­betes, plead­ed with Con­gress, say­ing, ‘I’ve met peo­ple in a park­ing lot to pro­vide them with in­sulin and help them sur­vive. This isn’t health care. This is sur­vival of the rich­est. The drug com­pa­nies have stat­ed that they’ve made record prof­its at the ex­pense of the lives of di­a­bet­ics.’

The House-passed Build Back Bet­ter Act would set a cap — no more than $35 — on what peo­ple who are in­sured pay for their in­sulin out of pock­et, al­though the unin­sured would not be pro­tect­ed by that pro­vi­sion. But Re­pub­li­cans in the Sen­ate are turn­ing to the par­lia­men­tar­i­an to see if the pri­vate in­sur­ance caps would vi­o­late bud­get res­o­lu­tion rules.

‘We are not go­ing to give up on this,’ House Speak­er Nan­cy Pel­soi said at the press con­fer­ence. ‘We look for­ward to a vote soon in the Sen­ate, hope­ful­ly very soon.’

In ad­di­tion to call­ing on the Sen­ate to pass the Medicare ne­go­ti­a­tions pro­vi­sion, the com­mit­tee al­so high­lights the need for re­forms that ad­dress an­ti­com­pet­i­tive prac­tices, in­clud­ing prod­uct hop­ping and tar­get­ing doc­tors to pre­scribe brand­ed through dis­pense-as-writ­ten cam­paigns.

‘Con­gress should con­sid­er re­forms to in­crease trans­paren­cy around phar­ma­ceu­ti­cal in­vest­ment in R&D. Cost trans­paren­cy would pro­vide valu­able da­ta about com­pa­nies’ in­vest­ments in in­no­va­tion and their claims that high costs of R&D jus­ti­fy the sky­rock­et­ing prices of their drugs,’ the re­port adds.
https://endpts.com/oversight-committee-unleashes-scathing-drug-pricing-report-as-senate-preps-to-vote-on-allowing-medicare-negotiations/